NNN Reporters Newsroom Forum  

Go Back   NNN Reporters Newsroom Forum > RSS FEED

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2020, 12:16 AM
Arheel's Uncle's Avatar
Arheel's Uncle Arheel's Uncle is online now
Ace Reporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Planet of the Apes.
Posts: 996
Default Krasner: Pa. Supreme Court halts Philly criminal trials streamed on YouTube over possible harassmen

Pa. Supreme Court halts Philly criminal trials streamed on YouTube over possible harassment

by Vinny Vella, Updated: September 17, 2020- 8:10 PM

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a halt to the live broadcasts of Philadelphia criminal trials on YouTube, after District Attorney Larry Krasner argued that the airing of such proceedings had opened a new window for harassment of witnesses, victims, and defendants.
In a brief order, the high court imposed an immediate stay on those broadcasts, which had become standard since the pandemic led to courtrooms across the city, state, and country being shut down. Courts in Philadelphia are still closed to attendance by the public.

The justices' decision directed the First Judicial District, which manages the city’s court system, to coordinate with state officials and find an alternate method for livestreaming trials.

Krasner’s petition said the practice of using dedicated, public YouTube broadcasts expanded the risks of intimidation of witnesses, defendants and victims alike.

READ MORE: Krasner is fighting to end online broadcasts of trials, a COVID workaround. Defenders and advocates are supporting his effort.

“The [First Judicial District] has gone too far in attempting to meet public access requirements in the COVID-19 era,
the district attorney and his staff wrote in the petition. “The policy of streaming criminal jury trials over YouTube violates the privacy of all parties and endangers witnesses in a jurisdiction known for intimidation and retaliation achieved through social media. There is no need to take these risks where ample alternatives exist that meet or exceed constitutional requirements.”


The filing was a direct appeal to the high court called a King’s Bench motion. They are rarely successful, but this one drew near-unanimous support from public defenders, legal advocates, and private attorneys.

It was not immediately clear what the impact of the order would be. In the petition, Krasner and his staff suggested a variety of alternatives, including using private Zoom calls and closed-circuit television feeds within the Stout Center for Criminal Justice.

A spokesperson for the court system deferred comment on the Supreme Court’s order to the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, and representatives from that office declined to comment late Thursday.

READ MORE: As jury trials resume in Philadelphia, courts lay out plans for juror safety

Krasner said Thursday night that he was “very encouraged that the Supreme Court recognized the urgency of the King’s Bench petition."

”It is essential in protecting the judicial process that we protect the people that participate in the process," he said. “And it’s of the utmost importance to protect witnesses and defendants from having their testimonies used against them for the rest of their lives.”

Posted: September 17, 2020 - 7:07 PM
Vinny Vella | @Vellastrations
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.